Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED753D30 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 19:08:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from emkei.cz (emkei.cz [46.167.245.206]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 801E967F for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 19:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by emkei.cz (Postfix, from userid 33) id ECAAED62AC; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 20:57:15 +0200 (CEST) To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org From: "Peter Todd" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Errors-To: pete@petertodd.org Reply-To: pete@petertodd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: <20180817190032.ECAAED62AC@emkei.cz> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 20:57:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: [bitcoin-dev] =?utf-8?q?Brock_Pierce=3F?= X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 19:08:09 -0000 From a censorship resistance point of view, I don't see EOS as a viable solution period. And anything supported by a pedo like Brock is just begging for failure.