Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8262C000D for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDA56064D for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:50:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tutanota.de Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9jfSgNSmRLjt for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:50:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from w1.tutanota.de (w1.tutanota.de [81.3.6.162]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 510336063D for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3D1FBF5CA; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:50:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1631699434; s=s1; d=tutanota.de; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:Sender; bh=zmUSFlDXsnYcRnjZh6foERmq4E5h0HK2GHgZvmZJR/U=; b=yY2eDzUVkuQZzBqEjkCfogbo7eJUcLbIU7ZIfYrjwDZCuce4VGw17D+1J8Eg6vm0 jS+eY1ss1adGp+pndz6KcB/g38FIq9nAG6QpZdnRkZF1Y7E9jwIGRufIpObhCAvvzeD qFxE3PeqeFX85AfGFTriUHXrBdUUIX7OgMArLMXbbl+wC7wx4bDPMsQuypwwultteIY ShUKtUGjkr9YpTY1owSWyeb40n7uEBK02uzjWjKM/spMPU9d3KBacY06YPtwV3MtVdd /7hoddwkj9F0km0quvsqx3VVqO2HM0x2igi58Jh5LCYanbJXv9gy50+cLb4u4VkCw3R wPkJx+JAEQ== Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:50:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Prayank To: laanwj@protonmail.com Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_726850_1663560498.1631699434225" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 10:03:36 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reminder on the Purpose of BIPs X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:50:38 -0000 ------=_Part_726850_1663560498.1631699434225 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > I like the idea of decentralizing the BIPs process. It is a historical artifact that the bips repository is part of the same organization that bitcoin core is part of. But there shouldn't be the perception that standardization is driven by that, or that there is any kind of (non-trivial) gatekeeping. I had suggested few changes in BIP process and repository yesterday. Meeting was disappointing because of few reasons: 1.Its been 12 years since Bitcoin came in to existence and I am surprised that during such important conversations I still see only 4 people out of which 2 are maintainers. 2.None of the people who participated in meeting agree that we need to create multiple BIP directories and let people decide what works best for them. Reduce dependency on one repository or few people. At the end of the day these are just proposals, implementations are more important and there are so many ways to document things online, archive etc. Playing ACK/NACK game in 'bitcoin/bips' repository will be a waste of time so I created this as an example: https://github.com/prayank23/bips/blob/master/README.md https://prayank23.github.io/bips/ I respect everyone involved in Bitcoin development however neither I trust anyone nor I expect anyone to trust me. Bitcoin is not just another open source software. Its a protocol for decentralized network which can be used to settle payments. We are trying to redefine MONEY, many cypherpunks, activists, hacktivists, privacy advocates etc. are involved and trying to separate money from state. The same money that is needed for almost everything you do in this world from birth to death, love to war and same money that makes some people more powerful. So, I won't be surprised with anything in future and will be prepared for everything. -- Prayank A3B1 E430 2298 178F ------=_Part_726850_1663560498.1631699434225 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> I like the idea of decentralizing the BIPs process. It is a histo= rical artifact that the bips repository is part of the same organization th= at bitcoin core is part of. But there shouldn't be the perception that stan= dardization is driven by that, or that there is any kind of (non-trivial) g= atekeeping.

I had su= ggested few changes in BIP process and repository yesterday. Meeting was di= sappointing because of few reasons:

<= div dir=3D"auto">1.Its been 12 years since Bitcoin came in to existence and= I am surprised that during such important conversations I still see only 4= people out of which 2 are maintainers.

2.None of the people who participated in meeting agree = that we need to create multiple BIP directories and let people decide what = works best for them. Reduce dependency on one repository or few people. At = the end of the day these are just proposals, implementations are more impor= tant and there are so many ways to document things online, archive etc.
=

Playing ACK/NACK game i= n 'bitcoin/bips' repository will be a waste of time so I created this as an= example:

https://gi= thub.com/prayank23/bips/blob/master/README.md
https://prayank23.github.io/bips/

I respect everyone involved in Bitc= oin development however neither I trust anyone nor I expect anyone to trust= me. Bitcoin is not just another open source software. Its a protocol for d= ecentralized network which can be used to settle payments. We are trying to= redefine MONEY, many cypherpunks, activists, hacktivists, privacy advocate= s etc. are involved and trying to separate money from state. The same money= that is needed for almost everything you do in this world from birth to de= ath, love to war and same money that makes some people more powerful. So, I= won't be surprised with anything in future and will be prepared for everyt= hing.

--
Prayank
=
A3B1 E430 2298 178F
------=_Part_726850_1663560498.1631699434225--