Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru1Pr-0005mQ-OF for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:41:59 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from nm24-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.90.34]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76) id 1Ru1Pq-0004VV-MS for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:41:59 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.57] by nm24.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2012 12:41:52 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.165] by tm10.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2012 12:41:52 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1021.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2012 12:41:52 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 920631.24762.bm@omp1021.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 12929 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Feb 2012 12:41:52 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: INWqVsAVM1n5uNr1bRmUSY4pZ.BGs13WjJuabddGJ4RZmnF zolDV9K_vgvuwo4YYxfKUQReS9Rzw9DsIOvVW9FSmGR9opC.Ca_hraKl2hes iblnUeoqtt8UMxu5tMDmwIh3.FPI8o7ctZdgplX7KL_ZR3GmQRI_HHLcPI_q G7f1QhHF4V6Z4SwLSGjNIE8XF1pxeAh5pBZtKnpQ.sFDuFwV1lBUPIe4F6dG im5tAGi4vZsWHIm.HOoLMBmAV1d_MHxekGW3.STwXJJeEX2XCMqtO2HV58v7 Dl1T7coiu43YjEjxrQoVJ2d72eF0s.bM4dRVDkqrFAoB89woqO4itq5L2aLH unNVs9vkXG0DGJ0Jz15Glp0QhmxTNChwYFQZhsDQb9sEU2Sd9QF1oER.0Kbd 8an44VMPjdYJn0.F9U2ksH_yZ9QOa21Efjw7BkiTZ_mFzirXNtbnMWmKS4ue CKsOPftZRntRO Received: from [92.20.114.29] by web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:41:52 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.116.338427 Message-ID: <1328445712.12150.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 04:41:52 -0800 (PST) From: Amir Taaki To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-2027350018-1125517483-1328445712=:12150" X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [98.138.90.34 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zgenjix[at]yahoo.com) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Ru1Pq-0004VV-MS Subject: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 21 accepted, new BIP 19 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Amir Taaki List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:41:59 -0000 ---2027350018-1125517483-1328445712=:12150 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii BIP 21 had broad consensus among the major implementations: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0021 BIP 19 is a document to propose adding a new payment type to the scripting system's template list. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0019 I haven't fully evaluated it completely but it seems solid. My only thoughts is that it uses a bunch of arithmetic operators which can behave in strange ways. ---2027350018-1125517483-1328445712=:12150 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
BIP 21 had broad consensus among the major implementations:

BIP 19 is a document to propose adding a new payment type to the scripting system's template list.
I haven't fully evaluated it completely but it seems solid. My only thoughts is that it uses a bunch of arithmetic operators which can behave in strange ways.
---2027350018-1125517483-1328445712=:12150--