Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
	designates 62.13.149.80 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=62.13.149.80; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
	helo=outmail149080.authsmtp.com; 
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 12:21:09 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>
Message-ID: <20150215172108.GA27520@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <CABm2gDo_sYjNWU6EEsKmOXt5uUu87Lj1oFzqio79MxSx2SYrNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<54DE7601.4070509@voskuil.org>
	<CABm2gDpt60B=Sf_2X9xt4fPH7x4fff7K4h36XfosHigV5tP+4Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<54DF07A5.1060004@voskuil.org>
	<CABm2gDoS+XOR7Ugt91kNWNdvwsb1_Zb-aO0sma_Xps2Sx-0N5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<54DF2E80.5060506@voskuil.org>
	<20150214131320.GA26731@savin.petertodd.org>
	<3D4F2E23-CADE-4FE7-B960-3F79815E868C@bitsofproof.com>
	<20150215170228.GB21269@savin.petertodd.org>
	<E0CB8E24-C67D-48B1-8D9F-2B71BAF13446@bitsofproof.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E0CB8E24-C67D-48B1-8D9F-2B71BAF13446@bitsofproof.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re:
 [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Precedence: list


--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 06:13:06PM +0100, Tamas Blummer wrote:
>=20
> On Feb 15, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> > Yes you are dicking around.
>=20
> I thought I was clear, that I am using Bitcoin Core as border router talk=
ing to its P2P interface.

Ah, sorry, that wasn't clear to me.

> The reimplementation of consensus code helped me to deeply understand the=
 protocol, aids debugging
> and now comes handy to create a side chain.

Indeed, which is why I've done a lot of work on a reimplementation of
the Bitcoin scripting system as well:

https://github.com/petertodd/python-bitcoinlib/blob/master/bitcoin/core/scr=
ipteval.py

Which has this cheery warning at the top:

"""Script evaluation

Be warned that there are highly likely to be consensus bugs in this
code; it is unlikely to match Satoshi Bitcoin exactly. Think carefully
before using this module.
"""

I'll be adding a FFI interface to libconsensus in the future... and I
probably should make that warning scarier...

--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000000ffb7a576b7aa5236c53f51ec07ccf174067beed3398056

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=Spfp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--