Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AB697E for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:12:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2807F199 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbsx3 with SMTP id sx3so69075189lbb.0 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 09:12:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=SYPrZX44SRgfWYEsFASyk6JCi3+IR7WRc7XErM66noA=; b=f/TwaR69ROilO6Jc5ZHLR0CJE5DbV7+86LQi+lGr9rFAAoXGXby1+KqKNyHm91nztF bIBl/fQiiF2x/ViK95uJ5sTl9RhdA7Ra8MQsOSEXvZIV2VVQgVFv8IPWE243plbljf2y kU3leT07UQ4XC8HU506WX5yUVqVx3H8NG1LdJmKbIddylmgHsjVRzt1ljscph5bsyqZT lH8cUT5N3Vp2szYljmVqg2juwbHY/w1NKvCrRB+TbGJi9zA8rlmLz9DdKCft1BQohTdy 04/OQ19t6wSCTmbsJRKBxr/ohDGYKQH9f5UwcLm5XfgDzNus+pdm2E9j9Fg9AemiGACl 8CZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl/DbXpwOcd1c8ygYGrBwg4s4evgf46iL7k2pfVSQXus38ZOodyIy48F4lxCMEpdH4XMh9u X-Received: by 10.112.170.103 with SMTP id al7mr52977640lbc.66.1439741545468; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 09:12:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <942BCFCD-5016-4523-AB7D-241F9E4DD0B1@bitsofproof.com> In-Reply-To: <942BCFCD-5016-4523-AB7D-241F9E4DD0B1@bitsofproof.com> From: Levin Keller Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:12:15 +0000 Message-ID: To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2381862ee0c051d6ff3d6 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT 0.11A X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:12:28 -0000 --001a11c2381862ee0c051d6ff3d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hear hear Tamas, I agree. I personally prefer to use the "only-bigblocks" branch and not XT with all its features - but as I am not mining that doesn't mean much anyhow. Nevertheless I am happy to be able to publicly proclaim my opinion that the block size should be raised asap. Thank you for going ahead Mike Levin Tamas Blummer via bitcoin-dev schrieb am So., 16. Aug. 2015 um 18:07 Uhr: > Being a bitcoin software developer an entrepreneur for years I learned > that success is not a direct consequence of technology and is not > inevitable. > BitcoinXT manifesto ( > https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt#the-xt-manifesto) should resonate > with many fellow entrepreneurs. > I applaud Mike and Gavin for creating that choice for us. > > Tamas Blummer > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > --001a11c2381862ee0c051d6ff3d6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hear hear Tamas,

I agree. I personally = prefer to use the "only-bigblocks" branch and not XT with all its= features - but as I am not mining that doesn't mean much anyhow. Never= theless I am happy to be able to publicly proclaim my opinion that the bloc= k size should be raised asap.

Thank you for going = ahead Mike

Levin

--001a11c2381862ee0c051d6ff3d6--