Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A230721 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:25:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87D01F0 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so109482948wic.1 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:25:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DE1dy0MPE5EnBw+b0JaC8CwDjKpawJNxIHkDglE4t/E=; b=sx2v80ZBpJGtJz+IJFnO6+VuEq15p4wd/aFD3j0xqVCqkF1Ok3gg+EMw7x00MLQNi8 vIrjNa5liQruBGyWsjr/d2KRHrPqGufVqw8CI6pdydQNyozSnouC4o/6duAI9VPclYoO w5JcrWvCRN5+/wdbDWytGKygpMZOiuVMZjMjcEjL+/7j7RB3U3e5zSAGkHx78AGMfhlb 2t69Htta5JMUNMPaokkeC+tXs/KWvn6QSveej2uedKR0IW3vvdsxfiyDNGgHEOVkce9X jI1/7ySVsFWCbnbf0f+bLmvh0AkM0ZEeth8+djOR/5/LPET9HmPmlN5eGmaebrEztjMP hk4g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.81.228 with SMTP id d4mr24997753wiy.38.1444782329190; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: dscotese@gmail.com Received: by 10.27.211.132 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:25:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <99C42DE7-814A-48F8-AB28-A5ADD77A9FD9@toom.im> <561D8A81.2020109@riseup.net> <468C1911-C504-4622-BCC8-FF0AAB17E874@toom.im> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:25:29 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: v782YnrZtZmidaJAXY0s6ycIQ6k Message-ID: From: Dave Scotese To: bitcoin-xt Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043bdb0e8264ae0522059955 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Memory leaks? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:25:31 -0000 --f46d043bdb0e8264ae0522059955 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 It was about 360MB (30 minutes ago?), but is now about 460MB. I'm sure it won't keep going up that fast. { "size" : 3413, "bytes" : 41892350 } On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Jonathan Toomim (Toomim Bros) wrote: > 16 million divided by 1085 transactions is almost 15Kb per transaction = > unlikely, right? > > > The recent spam was about 15 kB per transaction, so that part sounds right. > > The anomalous thing that I saw was that the total bitcoind process usage > was about 50-100x higher than I would have expected if the mempool was the > main determinant of memory usage scaling. Can you tell me how much memory > Task Manager is reporting your bitcoin process as using both today and > tomorrow? > > On Oct 13, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Dave Scotese via bitcoin-dev < > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > { > "size" : 1085, > "bytes" : 16151768 > } > It has been running about a day. I'll report tomorrow too. This is a > Windows 8.1 box. > 16 million divided by 1085 transactions is almost 15Kb per transaction = > unlikely, right? > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "bitcoin-xt" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to bitcoin-xt+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- I like to provide some work at no charge to prove my value. Do you need a techie? I own Litmocracy and Meme Racing (in alpha). I'm the webmaster for The Voluntaryist which now accepts Bitcoin. I also code for The Dollar Vigilante . "He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules" - Satoshi Nakamoto --f46d043bdb0e8264ae0522059955 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It was about 360MB (30 minutes ago?), but is now about 460= MB.=C2=A0 I'm sure it won't keep going up that fast.
{
"size" : 3413,
"bytes&quo= t; : 41892350
}


On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Jonathan Toomim (Too= mim Bros) <j@toom.im> wrote:
16 million divided by 1085 transactions is almost 15Kb per transaction= =3D unlikely, right?

The recent spam was about= 15 kB per transaction, so that part sounds right.

The anomalous thing that I saw was that the total bitcoind process usage w= as about 50-100x higher than I would have expected if the mempool was the m= ain determinant of memory usage scaling. Can you tell me how much memory Ta= sk Manager is reporting your bitcoin process as using both today and tomorr= ow?

On Oct 13, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Dave Scotese via bitcoi= n-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

<= blockquote type=3D"cite">

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;bitcoin-xt" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bitcoin-xt+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
I like to provide some work at no ch= arge to prove my value. Do you need a techie?=C2=A0
I own Litmocracy and Meme Racing (in alpha).
= I'm the webmaster for The Voluntaryist which now accepts Bitcoin.
I also code for= The Dollar Vigil= ante.
"He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules= " - Satoshi Nakamoto
--f46d043bdb0e8264ae0522059955--

{
"size" : 1085,
"bytes" : 16151768
}
=
It has been running about a day.= =C2=A0 I'll report tomorrow too.=C2=A0 This is a Windows 8.1 box.
=
16 million divided by 1085 transa= ctions is almost 15Kb per transaction =3D unlikely, right?