Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1W3jYp-0000dA-Ei for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:48:27 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.214.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.49; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com; helo=mail-bk0-f49.google.com; Received: from mail-bk0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1W3jYo-0004NS-En for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:48:27 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id 6so1088279bkj.36 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 01:48:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.204.172.145 with SMTP id l17mr5278842bkz.26.1389865699967; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 01:48:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.69.197 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 01:48:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20140106120338.GA14918@savin> <20140110102037.GB25749@savin> <20140113133746.GI38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk> <20140114225321.GT38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:48:19 +0100 Message-ID: From: Wladimir To: Gary Rowe Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52c5f5b552b5f04f01353d2 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (laanwj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1W3jYo-0004NS-En Cc: Bitcoin Development List Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Stealth Addresses X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:48:27 -0000 --bcaec52c5f5b552b5f04f01353d2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Gary Rowe wrote: > I like "reusable address". > Simple and clear, I like it too. I see the term is routing is used in finance in the USA, but as a Dutch person I associate "routing address" with network routing, not with banking. It's non-trivial to translate to a local term. Wladimir --bcaec52c5f5b552b5f04f01353d2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= hu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Gary Rowe <g.rowe@froot.co.uk>= wrote:
I like "reusable addre= ss".=C2=A0

Simple and clear, I l= ike it too.

I see the term is routing is used in finance in the USA= , but as a Dutch person I associate "routing address" with networ= k routing, not with banking. It's non-trivial to translate to a local t= erm.

Wladimir

--bcaec52c5f5b552b5f04f01353d2--