Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VS15o-0001U3-LG for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:50:36 +0000 Received-SPF: neutral (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: 74.220.220.113 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of trillion01.com) client-ip=74.220.220.113; envelope-from=olivier@trillion01.com; helo=outbound-ss-336.hostmonster.com; Received: from outbound-ss-336.hostmonster.com ([74.220.220.113]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76) id 1VS15n-0001yP-OT for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:50:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 22210 invoked by uid 0); 4 Oct 2013 03:23:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box610.bluehost.com) (70.40.220.110) by oproxy13.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 4 Oct 2013 03:23:50 -0000 Received: from [173.179.63.169] (port=48930 helo=[192.168.1.104]) by box610.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VRvza-0001Bu-Hg; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 21:23:50 -0600 Message-ID: <1380857029.932.49.camel@Wailaba2> From: Olivier Langlois To: Ron Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 23:23:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1380770163.7534.YahooMailNeo@web124502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1380770163.7534.YahooMailNeo@web124502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Organization: Trillion01 Inc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {5686:box610.bluehost.com:olivierl:trillion01.com} {sentby:smtp auth 173.179.63.169 authed with olivier@trillion01.com} X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.6 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT [74.220.220.113 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) X-Headers-End: 1VS15n-0001yP-OT Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] on CDB::Rewrite() X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:50:36 -0000 > Upon looking at the 0.8.5 & earlier code for CDB:Rewrite(), in the > files db.h and db.cpp, you will notice that in db.h it is declared > bool static, but in db.cpp it isn't. Is this a problem? Or a feature? > Or nothing at all? It is perfect C++ code. > Furthermore, it is called only in wallet.cpp > -->CWallet::EncryptWallet() but its return value is ignored? Again, > intentional or a bug or a feature or a ...? possibly a minor bug. Minor because over 99% of the time it is called, the Rewrite() function will succeed. Maybe CWallet::EncryptWallet() should return false to its callers when CDB::Rewrite fails.