> "Dr. Rich Artym" writes:
> >so many economists and other specialists tied into today's systems
> >appear so utterly incapable of making the (fairly small) mental leap
> >under which nanotech unravels almost entirely the fabric of today's
> >systems and institutions. Sure, it's not really "incomprehensible" at
> >all, but it might just as well be, as far as they are concerned.
>
> You probably mean me.
No, you were referring to others using the word "incomprehensible",
not to yourself, and I followed suit. I don't know if you comprehend
it or not --- see below.
> In my view you have failed to offer a coherent
> argument for such "unraveling". Maybe your leap isn't so small.
I did offer a coherent argument based on a very small leap in response
to your request for an explanation about a month or two ago. You did
not answer that item, so I don't know what your thoughts are on the
matter at present. A reply would help.
Rich.
-- ########### Dr. Rich Artym ================ PGP public key available # galacta # Email : rich@galacta.demon.co.uk 158.152.156.137 # ->demon # Web : http://www.galacta.demon.co.uk 194.222.245.150 # ->ampr # AMPR : rich@g7exm[.uk].ampr.org 44.131.164.1 BBS:GB7MSW # ->NTS # Fun : Unix, X, TCP/IP, kernel, O-O, C++, SoftEng, Nano ########### More fun: Regional IP Coordinator Hertfordshire + N.London