> Extropianism has never claimed or sought to be a complete philosophy.
Why not? Why settle for anything less?
One of my heroes, whose name I won't mention here, said
> The aim of human evolution is to attain a mystical vision of the
> universe.
I'm not sure "mystical" is the word I would use, but I agree that
evolution does have a purpose, and his way of expressing it
is the best I have seen. I might amend it as follows: The aim of
human evolution is to attain a complete vision of the universe, in which
all causal relations are manifest, down to the roots of causality.
Lyle