Greg Burch responds to Aaron Davidson:
> > Will we really have time to enjoy life in the future? Or will we be
> > constantly struggling in an intense battle to keep up with the trajectory
> > of future change. ... Does anyone have a plan to both surf the wave of
> > advancement/self-improvement and still *enjoy* some of the other things
> > life has to offer?
>
>This is a SUPERB question, Aaron. As you say, there are lots of reasons to
>rush to develop transhuman technologies now and folks like Robin Hanson and
>Robert Bradbury make compelling cases for being involved on the cutting edge
>(the "fuhstest with the mostest" strategy). But I (for one) am with you in
>the desire to take the time to smell the roses along the way.
I don't think we can answer this question well until we better understand
the evolutionary *function* of leisure. Leisure was something we evolved to
like, and I don't buy the "conserve energy while waiting for something to
happen" theory of leisure. Actual leisure is much more active than this.
So it must have had a more active function in our ancestor's lives.
My current theory is that leisure is mainly about "bonding." By spending
time with our social allies, we show that it is they who are our allies.
Of course this isn't our conscious motivation; it doesn't have to be.
I also hypothesize that social allies were relatively more valuable in
times of plenty, giving us an evolved tendency to spend more time in
leisure as we get richer.
Robin Hanson rhanson@gmu.edu http://hanson.gmu.edu
Asst. Prof. Economics, George Mason University
MSN 1D3, Carow Hall, Fairfax VA 22030
703-993-2326 FAX: 703-993-2323