So I have remained on the sidelines watching
yet another argument about religion wash
over the list, until now.
Look, you guys, I think it's safe to say we all
know that evolutionary theory is correct, that
our planet is millions of years old and was
not created in seven days, and that
Christianity was largely made up by a Roman
government committee hundreds of years
after the life of Jesus, if he ever really existed.
We all know that there is no "God" in the
sense of some huge all-powerful man with a
beard who created us and gets upset when
we have sex for any other reason than
procreation. Among intelligent people, which
probably includes anyone on this list, these
arguments have been won a long time ago. As
Nietzche said; that God is dead.
The "God" that is harder to vanquish is the
ineffable one that the mystics talk about, the
one that is defined as undefinable. This "God"
will never be disproven, for the same reason
that a child can always say "Why?" to
whatever explanation you give him. Like
"infinity", this "God" is a symbol and a useful
meme. To get upset when this symbol is used
is like getting upset when someone says
"infinity". If you're so lacking in a poetic sense
that you cannot appreciate this "God", that's
no reason to verbally abuse those that do.
Would you insult Douglas Hofstadter when
he uses the word "God" in this sense?
I don't find it hard to imagine an advanced SI with a brain the size of a planet thinking, analyzing, constructing and testing mental models, expending the energies of whole stars, for countless terateraflops, trying to understand the universe, why it's here, and ultimately giving up, realizing it'll never know, and at that moment feeling a great awe.