Skin aging and caloric restriction in monkeys

Doug Skrecky (oberon@vcn.bc.ca)
Fri, 15 Oct 1999 11:02:55 -0700 (PDT)

Authors
Pendergrass WR. Lane MA. Bodkin NL. Hansen BC. Ingram DK. Roth GS. Yi L. Bin H. Wolf NS.
Institution
Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA. Title
Cellular proliferation
potential during aging and caloric restriction in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
Source
Journal of Cellular Physiology. 180(1):123-30, 1999 Jul. Abstract
Caloric restriction (CR) is the most successful method of extending both median and maximal lifespans in rodents and other short-lived species. It is not yet clear whether this method of life extension will be successful in longer-lived species, possibly including humans; however, trials in rhesus monkeys are underway. We have examined the cellular proliferative potential of cells from CR and AL (ad libitum fed) monkey skin cells using two different bioassays: colony size analysis
(CSA) of dermal fibroblasts isolated and cloned directly from the skin and
beta-galactosidase staining at pH 6.0 (BG-6.0) of epidermal cells in frozen sections of skin. Decreases in both proliferative markers occurred with age, but no differences were observed between CR and AL animals. Skin biopsies were obtained from AL and CR rhesus monkeys from two different aging colonies, one at the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and one at the University of Maryland-Baltimore (UMB). These biopsies were used as a source of tissue sections and cells for two biomarkers of aging assays. The CR monkeys had been maintained for 9-12 years on approximately 70% of the caloric intake of control AL animals. In the CSA studies, the fraction of small clones increased significantly and the fraction of large clones decreased significantly with increasing age in AL monkeys. The frequency of epidermal BG-6.0 staining cells increased with age in older (>22 years) AL monkeys, but most predominately in those of the UMB colony, which were somewhat heavier than the NIH AL controls. Old monkeys on CR tended to have fewer BG-6.0-positive cells relative to old AL-derived epidermis, but this effect was not significant. These results indicate that cellular proliferative potential declined with age in Macaca mulatta, but was not significantly altered by CR under these conditions. Although these experiments are consistent with an absence of effect of CR on monkey skin cell proliferative potential, we have found in previous experiments with mice that a longer duration of CR
(as a fraction of total lifespan) was needed to demonstrate CR-related
improvement in clone size in mice. Further studies on the now mid-aged monkeys will be needed as their age exceeds 20 years to conclusively rule out an effect of CR on proliferative potential of skin cells from these primates.