"Samael" <Samael@dial.pipex.com> has a problem with semantics:
>An object starts off as unowned. Everyone could use it. Then somneone
It can't be theft because the idea of theft presupposes the idea of
property: specifically, it is the wrongful taking of someone else's
property. Where there's no property, there can't be theft.
>comes along and claims it. Now only they can use it. How is this not
>theft?
You may not like property rights, but equating property with theft is a nonsensical contradiction.
Dick