On Sun, 9 Nov 1997 Hal Finney <hal@rain.org> Wrote:
>Clearly he is not proving that Pw (the power set of omega) has the
>cardinality of aleph-one. He states that Pw has the same cardinality
>as 2^aleph-null, and he says that the CH says that 2^aleph-null =
>aleph-one. So if he were proving what you say, he would be claiming
>to prove the CH, which he says is impossible.
After rereading Rucker (it's been years) I can only conclude that you're
right yet again. I thought I never made mistakes but I guess I'm mistaken,
thanks for setting me straight about this.
John K Clark johnkc@well.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i
iQCzAgUBNGYoYX03wfSpid95AQEF3gTw4h9R+0u0RjBK5iNLNSOa1lj3KNMK9Rpr
qcRdO03lMEjAXARJLb7ypYOQ34URk6kjjw+n3JTUqQb2x7qAHqF4nxBHtrAWZ6XE
h3gSxrKMJx3gvef7LE4iNS4JDaAUZrt7VMcbNZACUCZJZQyWEhiKbG/49mozawKQ
lgs43zVSp/L+MYgg5KvOpBIRwtVJ7pZmqVwjCczrG+tpZWJC0ok=
=kkql
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----