I believe this book is available (in entirety) on the 'Net.
Max More wrote:
> =
> Eliezer: Hmmm, Godel, Escher, Bach *is* a superb book. I worked through=
> that back when I was 18. However, as an overview of AI and cognitive
> science, I think that Hofstadter and Dennett's The Mind's I might be mo=
re
> accessible. (Or maybe I'll just include both, though this is supposed t=
o be
> a select rather than comprehensive list.) Comments?
"The Mind's I" is philosophy of consciousness, which is intriguing - at l=
east
when D&H do it - but not core Extropy. "G=F6del, Escher, Bach" is philos=
ophy
of, AND a basic introduction to, Artificial Intelligence - which is as mu=
ch a
pillar of Extropy as space travel, Libertarianism, or cognitive science.
> For those who suggested more Egan books, I'll be happy to include more =
by
> one of my favorite SF writers. I'm not so keen on Permutation City, tho=
ugh
> may include it. I will definitely include his brilliant collection Axio=
matic.
=46rom "Permutation City":
Peer laughed. "So what are you going to do? Become a lobbyist now? Sp=
end
all your time petitioning Brussels and Geneva? "Human rights" are for p=
eople
who want to play at being human. I know who I am. I am *not* human." =
He
plunged his fist into his chest, effortlessly penetrating shirt, skin, a=
nd
ribs, and tore his heart out. He felt the parting of his flesh, and the=
aftermath - but although aspects of the pain were "realistic", preprogra=
mmed
barriers kept it isolated within his brain, a perception without any
emotional, or even metabolic, consequences. And his heart kept beating =
in his
hand as if nothing had happened; the blood passed straight between the r=
agged
ends of each broken artery, ignoring the "intervening distance."
I fell in love with his description of uploading. No gosh-wow, but well =
and
truly _*ALIEN*_. Not to mention that he writes hard science fiction abou=
t
speculation on the True Nature of Reality. I'd have said that was imposs=
ible,
at least before he did it.
Required reading. Definitely. Even "True Names" or "Marooned In Realtim=
e"
don't get that rating.
"Quarantine" also gets high marks, but as a technical study of why you ca=
n't
control humans or Powers by setting arbitrary goals to high levels. As m=
y
aphorism goes: "Trying to control AIs using the Three Laws of Robotics i=
s
like trying to communicate with them using the Lens of Arisia."
> Has anyone read Robert Forward's Indistinguisable from Magic? (I believ=
e it
> used to be known as Future Magic.) I think it may be a good overview of=
how
> far science and technology can be pushed. Perhaps I'll get to read it o=
n
> the plane this week.
I wasn't impressed. The fiction was amateurish. I don't recall much of =
the
science, but I don't recall it was impressive. Perhaps I'm just jaded - =
but
then, so are you. You should really try all of these out on null-X
(non-Extropian) friends, particularly the ones you recommend as introduct=
ions.
-- =
sentience@pobox.com Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
http://tezcat.com/~eliezer/singularity.html
http://tezcat.com/~eliezer/algernon.html
Disclaimer: Unless otherwise specified, I'm not telling you
everything I think I know.