With a 5.6 trillion dollar debt, 26 trillion aggregate debt, two identical
"parties" pobtificating about inane nonsense like volunteerism and family
values, and Chinese communists buying a California naval base, "well"
hardly describes the situation.
Therefore, the
>most we can expect is gradual movement, except as the system is forced
>to change in response to very rapid technological change. Example:
>technology permits direct democracy and real-time access to all
>government functions, but neither is likely because the system doesn't
>require it: inertia wins.
While technology may permit direct democracy, the Constitution definately
does not.
>JD