> In a message dated 97-10-01 15:39:40 EDT, you write:
>
> << > Actually, morality seems to favor species survival rather than
> > individual survival,
>
> I don't understand how you can use "rather" here, since you
> can't have one of these things without the other. If you're
> favoring one, then you're favoring the other. >>
>
>
> I just had a thought on this ...not fully formed but maybe someone else can
> do something with it...
>
> Could it be that ethics is individual while moral is group? (species, family,
> social or somethin?)
>
> Dawkins goes into some detail explaining how individual anti-survival actions
> can be pro-survival for the gene...only some of which I understand..
>
> Like I said..I'm still in a fog...
>
Here's another thought on ethics and morals. Maybe, both are
just words. Nothing more. Just words. Just words, used mostly
to manipulate people.
Hmmm...Just a thought?
Forever, we decide.
Ray
Raiford C. Dudley Jr., President
Dudley Accelerated Learning Systems
<http://www.quickness.com/~speedreading/> <bookread@idt.net>
1-800-205-7432...The 24-hour toll-free 800 number where we
will double your reading speed and comprehension while you
are on the telephone. You too can experience "Total Recall".