On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 Spudboy100@aol.com wrote:
> Would not a judge determine whether a child was yours or not?
If the judge makes the determination based on DNA evidence (as they
now seem to do) I don't see where there is a problem. The chances
of it being a wrong decision are very low and subject to being
corrected by additional tests. If it isn't my genetic child then
I have no moral obligation to support it. (I'm unsure how the
"legal" situation works -- I suspect at a minimum the genetic
father would be required to pay child support.)
> What if there exists, a situation where a child does not result, yet infidelity is still
> undertaken? Wouldn't a person still feel betrayed by the infidelity? Are we,
> as the highest of anthrpoid apes, still driven exclusively, by
> genetic/behavioral determinism, or are we as intelligences, slightly, more
> ego-bound?
It depends entirely on the degree to which a person has allowed either
their personal survival or emotional well being to become intertwined
with their partner. I personally don't see much value in regulating
the behavior of other adults. So I doubt I'd feel "betrayed" by
infidelity. I might feel some emotional loss if such a situation
arose unexpectedly (e.g. a partner had indicated they had wanted to be
faithful but had accidentally strayed) but since I know what is
generating those feelings (the genetic/memetic "jealousy" machine)
I'm not going to place a high value on them.
Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:24 MDT