"J. R. Molloy" wrote:
>
> From: <CurtAdams@aol.com>
>
> > Are you saying terrorism is OK if it works?
> > Or if it's done in a "good cause"?
>
> If it ends a World War, as the bombing of Hiroshima/Nagasaki did, it ain't
> that bad.
> ...are you saying that you oppose good causes?
> How lame.
The logical fallacy here is the assumption that the inhabitants of
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are to be considered 'non-combatants' under the
Geneva Conventions.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:21 MDT