Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)

From: Max More (max@maxmore.com)
Date: Sun Nov 25 2001 - 02:47:28 MST

Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: WAR: appropriate first use (was: If we do get Afghanistan...)"
Previous message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: SETI@home (was Re: Folding@home 2.0)"
In reply to: John Clark: "Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)"
Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 11:49 PM 11/24/01, you wrote:

Max More extropians@extropy.org Wrote:

>Please refrain from public posts like this.

Ok Max, it's your list not mine.

John K Clark jonkc@att.net

Thank you, John.

I look forward to seeing the same restraint from others in this and other discussions.

Onward!

Max

_______________________________________________________
Max More, Ph.D.
max@maxmore.com or more@extropy.org
http://www.maxmore.com
Strategic Philosopher
President, Extropy Institute. http://www.extropy.org <more@extropy.org>
_______________________________________________________

Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: WAR: appropriate first use (was: If we do get Afghanistan...)"
Previous message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: SETI@home (was Re: Folding@home 2.0)"
In reply to: John Clark: "Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)"
Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:21 MDT