Re: Ad hominem? I think not.

From: John Clark (jonkc@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Wed Nov 21 2001 - 00:05:11 MST

Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: If we do get Afghanistan, what shall we do with it?"
Previous message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Kurzweil & co."
In reply to: Curious: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
Next in thread: Harvey Newstrom: "RE: Ad hominem? I think not."
Reply: Harvey Newstrom: "RE: Ad hominem? I think not."
Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hey Eliezer, Curious <curious@hyperreal.pl> just wrote " Bin laden could drop
Biological-Bomb instead of ONLY crashing WTC. i think Bin Laden was VERY polite!"
I wonder, do you think this is reasonable discourse too, would you criticizes me if I
called even this bozo an idiot?

John K Clark jonkc@att.net

Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: If we do get Afghanistan, what shall we do with it?"
Previous message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Kurzweil & co."
In reply to: Curious: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
Next in thread: Harvey Newstrom: "RE: Ad hominem? I think not."
Reply: Harvey Newstrom: "RE: Ad hominem? I think not."
Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:20 MDT