Michael S. Lorrey writes:
> A) the gun ban was for a month. All that proved was that ExI is weak
My original proposal was to split the list in two parts: exi-moderated
and exi-rejected. I would hardly call that censorship because by
subscribing to both list you still would get the full picture. (Btw, I
know of at least one technical list which runs that way).
Of course I agree that this approach is too crude, personal
server-side filtering would have been much better, and hardly more
difficult to implement. Btw, what is the state of the new list
structure implementation project? (Sorry, I've not been paying
attention lately).
> B) the fascists and those they have programmed with their propaganda
Mike, these topics are supposed to be banned. Discuss them off-list as
much as you wish, but please not here.
> enough to bow to calls for censorship among the membership, and that
> there are enough members to help found the exi-freedom mail list...
> never tire of thinking up excuses why we should surrender our freedoms,
> so why should I tire of defending our freedoms against their attacks?
> The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. I've paid that price before,
> and I will pay it again.
> C) despite the ballooning violent crime rates in Britain and Japan,
> these people still can't figure out that its people that kill people.