On Tue, 31 Aug 1999 GBurch1@aol.com wrote:
> I think the Extropian Principles are inconsistent with unchecked central
> state authority or the use of coercion against people and groups who mind
> their own business or to restrict the rights of individuals to make whatever
> contracts they choose to make.
Agreed.
> I think that someone who holds extropian
Agreed with a footnote. We have to face the reality of *how* to move
from the existing "statist" solution where the benefits & costs have
complex evolutionary histories, to one where "states" strongly
view their "mission statement" as one of minimal intervention.
Change invokes the threat of survival and while the anarchists
would like to do it tomorrow, I charge that *realistically* that
will not happen (unless we can open a new frontier), so the
requirement, if we are to avoid fantasies, is how to move step-by-step
from the current reality *to* the "ideal" situation.
My perspective, is that if the environment is depromoting
rational thought the best situation may be to use the weapons
of the environment against itself. The threat of school competition
might motivate the teachers to rise up against pin-headed school
boards. This is not a theoretical argument, it *is* a reality based
argument.
> values and ideals should by and large take the stance that people who propose
> a statist solution to a social problem have the burden of showing how that
> proposed solution doesn't do more harm than good by restricting the freedom
> of individuals to carry on their lives as they choose.
Robert