>On Wed, 25 Aug 1999 jmcasey@pacific.net.sg wrote:
>
> > Then doesn't this bring me back to my original question. The photon
> > that passes through gate A in Universe 1 and gate B in Universe 2 goes
> > on to be absorbed by particles X and Y respectively, and unless and
> > until we devise a measurement that allows us to precisely trace its
> > "actual" trajectory, we never know for sure which universe we're in.
> > Right? And since this sort of subatomic interaction takes place
> > googols of times a second, universes are being created googols of
> > times a second. And because measurement of these phenomena takes place
> > on only a laughably small fraction of the total, alternate universes
> > collapse only rarely.
> >
> > And if I'm still following a valid logical chain, what particular set
> > of events causes us to perceive *this* particular universe over all
> > the others, or is it just chance?
>
>Try imagining a split just ABOUT to happen. During this split, one split
>version of you will go on to exist in "Universe A," while the other split
>version of you will go on to exist in "Universe B." From this past
>perspective, it obviously doesn't make sense to ask "Why will I perceive A
>and not B?" because, in point of fact, you (that is, the unsplit you) will
>perceive both (once you split). Why X? Not X.
>
>The reason your question is harder to think about after the split is
>because when a split version of you thinks about the other split version
>of you, the other split version necessarily seems a little less real.
>This is not a fact about physics; this is a fact about psychology and the
>way we use language.
>
>Suppose the A version of you is thinking about the B version of you.
>When the A version says "I," it means the A version and ONLY the A
>version; not the B version. The B version is different from the A
>version; since we are very used to the idea that "I" refers to only one
>thing and not two different things, it's quite natural to think, right or
>wrong, that after the split, you are not the same person as the other
>version of you in the other branch. Since you seem very, very real to
>yourself, anything that is not you (in this case, version B) seems
>slightly less certain; slightly less real. [Or, in the case of an
>abstract theory like MWI, perhaps far, far less certain/real indeed.]
>
>Now we return to your question, "why do I perceive A and not B?" I'd
>argue that this is because it's very natural for one to think of a person
>on one side of the branch as different from the person on the other side
>of the branch. The other version of you is perceiving B, but since that
>version isn't "you," "you" aren't perceiving B. That is why "you"
>perceive A and not B. If you were to call both splits in both branches
>"you," which comes quite naturally BEFORE the split, since before the
>split both versions DO seem more like yourself, the question would seem
>pretty meaningless.
>
>(You know, sometimes I wonder if I'm in John Clark's killfile.)
>
> -THAT THAT IS IS THAT THAT IS NOT IS NOT-
If you except the idea that a person is his memories then there realy are two different people. When the split accurs then each person would begin developing memories from his view point. Since two people can't be in the same place at the same time then there must be two different view points.
Oh, now I understand what you guys have been saying now. They would both still be you, just each version picks up from there. If you were never split and stood in place of person A then you would aquire the memories person A would have. And if you stood in place of person B you would aquire the memories person B would have. In either case you are unquestionably you because you were never split. Now split you into person A and person B and the memories are aquired just the same but to each person. They would both be you!
My apologies to you Robert for not understanding last week. I still have a pretty good concept of consciousness though. That, I'm finishing up this Friday.
( * * )
\__/ clintodell@hotmail.com
_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com