At 09:09 PM 1/07/99 -0400, Mikey wrote:
>I'm not surprised that an anti-individualist like Moorcock would brand
Have another look at what he wrote. (I know it's painful.) ST was the last
book he thinks is kinda *okay*, becaue it's a gritty Bildungsroman.
Heinlein
>based on just one of his books, Starship Troopers, and that his abilities at
>literary analysis would be quite so stunted.
>If Moorcock had instead fixated on
>_Stranger in a Strange Land_ before reading ST, I can imagine that he
would be
>singing the praises of Heinlein as a Buddhist, anti-establishment, pro-sexual
>revolution radical out to create a new transhumanist religion.
Aargh. It's STRANGER and the rest of the increasingly self-indulgent books that Moorcock finds so fatuous and suspect. Jubal rules the roost, even if the `girls' chuck him in the pool occasionally, because he is the Silverback with silver in his pocket. Mike the Archangel from Mars is right because... well, because *that's the way things are*, and he *knows it* because he can speak *Martian, the Truth Language* and hence kill his enemies at a thought. A vision of a post-Singularity Power? Maybe - but a troubling one. Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Damien Broderick