>In a message dated 97-09-05 11:47:57 EDT, you write:
>
><< You've got to read these things more carefully. The pictures aren't
>pictures
> of chromosomes, as just glancing at them will tell. They claim to be
> pictures of "chromozones", whatever they are. Neither my dictionary, my
> medical dictionary, nor any of my biology texts has any definition or
> reference to "chromozone". I couldn't find any other reference to
> "chromozone" on the Web, either.
> >>
>
>Its obviously a typo.
No, it's not just a typo. I've seen pictures of chromosomes, and those
pictures aren't chromosome pictures. The name appears to be chosen to
deceive, at least to grant a spurious aura of tradition to an unverified
assay. That in itself is most suspicious.