Message is undeliverable.
Reason: Unable to access cc:Mail Post office.
Please retry later.
Original text follows:
---------------------
--simple boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ACSII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: from maxwell.lucifer.com by smtpgate.netcon.co.za (ccMail Link to SMTP R6.0)
; Fri, 05 Sep 97 20:05:45 +0200
Return-Path: <postmaster@extropy.org>
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by maxwell.lucifer.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA27332 for extropians-outgoing; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 10:04:08 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.lucifer.com: majordom set sender to postmaster@extropy.org using -f
From: CurtAdams@aol.com
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 12:03:18 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <970905115931_393279828@emout19.mail.aol.com>
To: extropians@extropy.org
Subject: Re: Extropy definition
Sender: postmaster@extropy.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: extropians@extropy.org
In a message dated 9/5/97 2:01:07 AM, YakWaxx@aol.com wrote:
>CurtAdams@aol.com wrote:
>
>> I recently stated my disagreement with the extropian terminology "dynamic
>> optimism" partly because it implies that extropian "optimism" results
from
>> irrational faith rather than hard-headed realistic evaluation of fact.
>
>I think having a malleable soft sponge like head (ie, an open mind) is
better
>than a hard-head.
There's no incompatibility. Being hard-headed about fact, as opposed to
opinion, forces me to be open-minded.
--simple boundary--