> : But here on the
> : net conversational style seems to be important to show our identity.
>
> As well as certain visual features. Anders has his conspicuous (yet
> tasteful) .sig, John Clark his long indents, EvMick his caenisms --
> without these features, I'd have less of a sense of their distinctness.
> I don't mean to say that without such visual stylisms you're doomed to
> be a blur in my mind, but it does take longer for me to form an
> impression of who's who.
And then there's you, with your _slightly unconventional_ quoting. Perhaps a
reflection of your personality? But what have I got other than a ridiculous
name and a poor understanding of grammar? Hmmm.. Perhaps a reflection of my
personality!
--Wax