Both.
>If you are doing this with hope of convincing some bass-ackwards judge
I've spoken with Judge Linda Lau; your description is inapproriate.
>You've made more than a mockery of legal argument with your post.
I'm not a legal draughtsman. Amicus curiae briefs are informal in character.
> There must be more to it than you've actually posted.
Yes.
> If so, please fill me in.
Concerning what?
> If not, then I've definitely failed law school.
All depends... >:-}
Let's see your version first.
Tony