Re: Everett
Hara Ra (harara@shamanics.com)
Tue, 05 Aug 1997 22:44:00 -0700
Sean Morgan wrote:
>
> Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com>
> >[...] most of
> >the interpretations, from the Copenhagen Observer to Everett's many
> >worlds appear to be unprovable, and per our friend Ockham, not needed
> >either, save for our monkey brains which see thru monkey eyes.
>
> That is so common a misperception that it makes the many-worlds-faq
> http://kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu/~kamikaze/documents/many-worlds-faq.html
>
It all hinges on the term "complex", which, like "soul" and
"consciousness" is subject to a wide variety of interpretations. You
also didn't read what I actually said, which was that most of the QM
interpretations seem to be both unprovable and unneeded. Not just
Everett...
O---------------------------------O
| Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> |
| Box 8334 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 |
O---------------------------------O