Re: Tegmark's Anthropism

Hara Ra (harara@shamanics.com)
Sun, 03 Aug 1997 22:50:13 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Hara Ra: "Re: META: Help with Spam"
Previous message: CurtAdams@aol.com: "Re: Why the West has 'won'."
Maybe in reply to: Steve Witham: "Tegmark's Anthropism"
Next in thread: Eric Watt Forste: "Re: The Next Century's Great Discovery"

Hal Finney wrote:
> From the web page at
> http://eve.physics.ox.ac.uk/Personal/deutsch/FabricOfReality/FoR.html
>
> > For example, both the growth
> > of scientific knowledge and the evolution of biological adaptations are
> > best understood as multi-universe phenomena: normally, universes tend
> > to become less alike with time, and the only two known processes capable
> > of making them more alike are biological evolution and human thought.

I choke on this. Though physical constraints make solutions to forms
similar,
such as fish and airplanes, the details are absurdly diverse. Is this
convergence?

O---------------------------------O
| Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> |
| Box 8334 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 |
O---------------------------------O

Next message: Hara Ra: "Re: META: Help with Spam"
Previous message: CurtAdams@aol.com: "Re: Why the West has 'won'."
Maybe in reply to: Steve Witham: "Tegmark's Anthropism"
Next in thread: Eric Watt Forste: "Re: The Next Century's Great Discovery"