> That being stipulated...wouldn't it require a language to transmit
> "consciousness"...or at least some type of meme vector....(TV transmits
> stupidy...is this to much of a stretch?)
Reposting something I put on Cryonet.....
=> From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>:
=> Absent a definition, its hard to even begin reasoning about the
=> property. Things which are so slippery that they have no good
=> definition should arouse our suspicion.
= OK. Let's get some definitions going here. Get out your nits and pick
= away, but the price to join the picking is to offer a definition of
your
= own:
= -------------------------
= Definition: Consciousness
= A system is conscious if:
= 1. It is capable of lingusitic communication (it can talk)
= 2. It can discuss its own existence (it knows it exists)
= -------------------------
= The second condition is the tough one, of course. Let me propose a
= Turing style test by saying that a human using a teletype could not
= distinguish between a human (or other system presumed to be known as
= conscious) and the system under test, with the discussion limited to
the
= topics we usually consider to be "about consciousness". If that is too
= general, how about "experience of existence".
= As a challenge to the deeper thinkers here, I state that a ruthless
= application of the above definition combined with the following idea
= leads quite logically to a reaonably good definition of "soul".
= 3. All of my memories of being conscious include the memory of
my
= existence.
= Have fun!
O---------------------------------O
| Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> |
| Box 8334 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 |
O---------------------------------O