From: "Ken Clements" <Ken@Innovation-On-Demand.com>
> When I used the term "traditionally" above I was talking about the many
> centuries of history of steganography. Read any history of cryptography
book
> for this stuff.
Sorry. I didn't know you had drifted into history. I thought you were part
of the modern "government can't spy on me because I have encryption" crowd.
> What I am talking about is using one time
> codes based on actual random physics.
I must have missed that post. I only heard that embedding a message in a
picture makes it undetectable, and that is what I was objecting to.
--- Louis Newstrom lnewstro@bellsouth.net http://personal.lig.bellsouth.net/~newstrom
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:54 MDT