On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Harvey Newstrom wrote:
> This is called steganography. It is easy to detect if one looks for
> it. Most people just look at pretty pictures and don't try to run
> cryptographic software on the data bits. If one does look at the
> data, it is easy to detect as an encoded message. This doesn't add
Um, no. Not if properly done. Which reminds me.
> any cryptographic strength to the message, but is a form of "security
> by obscurity".
Here's 20 tons of paper. Find me the 18th century manuscript. You have 30
seconds.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:51 MDT