Spike Jones wrote,
> Isnt it possible to encode messages into graphics? Dont
> they encode the message into some chaotic background
> like sand or grass? Seems like it could be inserted into
> photos in such a way that it could never be proved that
> the image *has* any text encoded. How could such a
> thing ever be made illegal if the feds couldn't prove there
> was a message there? spike
This is called steganography. It is easy to detect if one looks for it.
Most people just look at pretty pictures and don't try to run cryptographic
software on the data bits. If one does look at the data, it is easy to
detect as an encoded message. This doesn't add any cryptographic strength
to the message, but is a form of "security by obscurity".
-- Harvey Newstrom <http://HarveyNewstrom.com> <http://Newstaff.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:50 MDT