To a politician, disagreement is a tool of attack.

From: Eugene Leitl (Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Sat Sep 15 2001 - 15:52:13 MDT

Next message: Eugene Leitl: "Re: Another new offensive strategies"
Previous message: J. R. Molloy: ""Altruism In Groups""
Next in thread: Party of Citizens: "Re: To a politician, disagreement is a tool of attack."
Reply: Party of Citizens: "Re: To a politician, disagreement is a tool of attack."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

As Matt Blaze pointed out at USENIX Security this year, politicians
aren't scientists. We value logic and truth. Politicians value
getting people to agree. A scientist's pursuit of logic and truth
uses disagreement. To a politician, disagreement is a tool of
attack. -- Carl Ellison <cme@acm.org>

Next message: Eugene Leitl: "Re: Another new offensive strategies"
Previous message: J. R. Molloy: ""Altruism In Groups""
Next in thread: Party of Citizens: "Re: To a politician, disagreement is a tool of attack."
Reply: Party of Citizens: "Re: To a politician, disagreement is a tool of attack."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:47 MDT