Re: World Trade Center taken out

From: Michael M. Butler (butler@comp-lib.org)
Date: Tue Sep 11 2001 - 15:06:42 MDT


Two counter points:
The bomber wasn't *trying* to hit the building. And I'd bet it wasn't "heavy" (full of fuel).

Ralph Lewis wrote:
>
> Interesting that the Empire State Building took a direct hit of an american
> air force bomber with a much more explosive fuel (aviation gas) than jet
> fuel and damage was minimal. Makes you wonder about building standards and
> building permit enforcement today.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:28 MDT