Samantha Atkins wrote:
>
> Charlie Stross wrote:
> >
> > It's not censorship. It's just that there's not really a market for
> > her ideas here. Clue: she's considered rather radical by US standards.
> > By British norms she's barking mad. She may well have been published
> > here -- but never made the bestseller lists, and isn't in print today
> > (or at any time in my living memory).
> >
>
> Sorry, but that is censorship if it is not at least tried to
> publish the works of a best selling author. If she is "barking
> mad" by British norms (though I hardly think you speak for all
> British) then so much the worse for the country.
Besides, I thought that the brits always had a thing for mad dogs...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:24 MDT