Re: Fw: Back to Serfs and Royalty?

From: Spike Jones (spike66@attglobal.net)
Date: Sat Sep 01 2001 - 00:40:31 MDT

Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Shame on Australia"
Previous message: Zero Powers: "Re: MEDIA: CBN News The Science of Human Longevity"
In reply to: Olga Bourlin: "Fw: Back to Serfs and Royalty?"
Next in thread: Charlie Stross: "Re: Fw: Back to Serfs and Royalty?"
Reply: Charlie Stross: "Re: Fw: Back to Serfs and Royalty?"
Reply: Miriam English: "Re: Fw: Back to Serfs and Royalty?"
Reply: Harvey Newstrom: "RE: Fw: Back to Serfs and Royalty?"
Reply: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Fw: Back to Serfs and Royalty?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Bosses' pay soars but not workers'

WASHINGTON -- When last I took a Labor Day occasion to compare the
average American workers' paychecks to those of their bosses, the score
was 1 to 419. That was two years ago.

Olga Bourlin wrote: What would the libertarian solution be for
something like this? (Is there a solution?)

Is there a problem? spike

Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Shame on Australia"
Previous message: Zero Powers: "Re: MEDIA: CBN News The Science of Human Longevity"
In reply to: Olga Bourlin: "Fw: Back to Serfs and Royalty?"
Next in thread: Charlie Stross: "Re: Fw: Back to Serfs and Royalty?"
Reply: Charlie Stross: "Re: Fw: Back to Serfs and Royalty?"
Reply: Miriam English: "Re: Fw: Back to Serfs and Royalty?"
Reply: Harvey Newstrom: "RE: Fw: Back to Serfs and Royalty?"
Reply: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Fw: Back to Serfs and Royalty?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:23 MDT