Re: Shelters "of no use"?, was Re: Media ignores Ballistic Missile defense.

From: Spike Jones (spike66@attglobal.net)
Date: Tue Aug 28 2001 - 09:06:54 MDT

Next message: Mitchell, Jerry (3337): "RE: Paying for Schools (was: SOCIETY: Re: The privatization of pu blic security)"
Previous message: Loree Thomas: "RE: Nominalism"
In reply to: Michael M. Butler: "Shelters "of no use"?, was Re: Media ignores Ballistic Missile defense."
Next in thread: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Shelters "of no use"?, was Re: Media ignores Ballistic Missile defense."
Reply: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Shelters "of no use"?, was Re: Media ignores Ballistic Missile defense."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Michael M. Butler" wrote:

> But if somebody takes out (say) downtown San Jose, CA, and I am living
> 20 miles away, then hell, yes, a shelter is some use to me...

Waaaaait a minute. *Any* hypothetical nuclear attack must target
*Seattle* not San Jose! spike

Next message: Mitchell, Jerry (3337): "RE: Paying for Schools (was: SOCIETY: Re: The privatization of pu blic security)"
Previous message: Loree Thomas: "RE: Nominalism"
In reply to: Michael M. Butler: "Shelters "of no use"?, was Re: Media ignores Ballistic Missile defense."
Next in thread: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Shelters "of no use"?, was Re: Media ignores Ballistic Missile defense."
Reply: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Shelters "of no use"?, was Re: Media ignores Ballistic Missile defense."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:20 MDT