"natashavita@earthlink.net" wrote:
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Samantha Atkins samantha@objectent.com\
>
> >Wouldn't it be better to gather the richness of people's
> experience with transhumanism and the various views over time
> instead of quibbling over what the word does and does not mean
> and who gets to say?<
>
> Do you feel a need to quibble? I don't. I feel a need to express views which should not bother you at all. You express your views very often and often in a hard-nosed fashion.
I beg to differ. Why are you taking offense? I wasn't. You
seem a bit prickly.
>Let it pass, Samantha and enjoy each step of the road of >transhumanity. It's all exciting and there will be issues that come >and go and the ones of meaning will stick. And folks who disregard >another person's thoughts on the circumstances and unimportant might >just pick up a few riches along the way.
Isn't that pretty much what I said above?
- samantha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:05 MDT