Re: CHEM: Nitrogen Buckyball explosives...

From: Eugene Leitl (Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Mon Jul 30 2001 - 04:36:29 MDT

Next message: John Clark: "Re: CHEM: Nitrogen Buckyball explosives..."
Previous message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: New Singapore surveillance software can detect abnormal behaviour"
In reply to: Mike Lorrey: "Re: CHEM: Nitrogen Buckyball explosives..."
Next in thread: John Clark: "Re: CHEM: Nitrogen Buckyball explosives..."
Reply: John Clark: "Re: CHEM: Nitrogen Buckyball explosives..."
Reply: Mike Lorrey: "Re: CHEM: Nitrogen Buckyball explosives..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 29 Jul 2001, Mike Lorrey wrote:

> Well, it's not THAT powerful. It has around 50% more energy than the
> current top chemical explosive, according to simulations. Now, this

A 50% energy density increase in high energy density explosives means very
large news for fission primers and pure fusion weapons.

Next message: John Clark: "Re: CHEM: Nitrogen Buckyball explosives..."
Previous message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: New Singapore surveillance software can detect abnormal behaviour"
In reply to: Mike Lorrey: "Re: CHEM: Nitrogen Buckyball explosives..."
Next in thread: John Clark: "Re: CHEM: Nitrogen Buckyball explosives..."
Reply: John Clark: "Re: CHEM: Nitrogen Buckyball explosives..."
Reply: Mike Lorrey: "Re: CHEM: Nitrogen Buckyball explosives..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:59 MDT