Re: Big Bang is Bunk

From: Miriam English (miriam@werple.net.au)
Date: Thu Jul 26 2001 - 02:56:36 MDT


At 01:59 AM 26/07/2001 -0400, Pat Fallon wrote:

>Miriam English wrote:
>
> > I actually think the steady-state theory makes a LOT more sense than the
> > entire universe popping into existence in one instant,...
>
>I'd agree that the Big Bang is bunk.
>

<big, wonderfully informative snip>

What a great post, Pat!

The idea that light could traverse millions of lightyears without losing
energy always seemed to me a dubious one. Because light can't lose energy
in its intensity like sound does, it would need to lose it in its
wavelength. You would end up with a redshift coupled with distance. It
would also be likely to lose lots of energy climbing out of deep gravity
wells. I guess that is the "tired light" concept you mentioned in your
wonderful post.

The universe is shaping up to be a real beauty for transhumans: a truly
infinite playground!

Cheers,

         - Miriam

---------=---------=---------=---------=---------=---------=------
Q. What is the similarity between an elephant and a grape?
A. They are both purple... except for the elephant.
---------=---------=---------=---------=---------=---------=------
http://werple.net.au/~miriam
http://members.optushome.com.au/miriame
Virtual Reality Association http://www.vr.org.au



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:57 MDT