> From: "Spike Jones" <spike66@attglobal.net>
> > Actually GEB:EGB would be a more difficult source from which
> > to base doctrine, because we have no concordance nor soft copy.
> > That I know of. We need one. spike
>
> soft copy details of table of contents:
> http://www.egodeath.com/geb.htm
>
> "J. R. Molloy" wrote: We don't need a soft copy of the entire text (which is
> older than Eliezer and
> reads somewhat like a core dump), because we have Google.com, which correlates
> to a GEB stem cell containing the DNA of the Global Brain.
JR, you speak great blammesphies! Be advised Eliezer is a bit
touchy on the youth thing. {8-] Fortunately he's a good sport.
Thanks for the link! spike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:50 MDT