Lee Corbin wrote:
> I don't know about Spike, but poverty was
> definitely my motivator. With just a small guaranteed annual
> income,
I would only have needed enough to pay my rent,
which was 50 dollars a month in 1983, and another
200 would feed me. I dont eat much. But there was
no 250 a month back then.
> I would have never abandoned playing chess, reading SF,
> and carousing around with my friends discussing philosophy and
> mathematics---
Leeeeee! You play? Cool, we should do some email
chess. Cool, where were you at E5? Have an rating?
I meant in chess, not in carousing. {8^D
> So I would suggest that *at the present time* a substantial
> guaranteed income would have both serious economic consequences
> and also deleterious psychological and educational consequences
> for many people. Lee
Heres how we work this: set up a pool that anyone can
contribute whatever amount they want. Then at the end of
the month we distribute it evenly among all who want a share
of this guaranteed income. Note the guarantee only applies
to the share, not the actual amount. How much do you
suppose that amount would be? spike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:42 MDT