At 08:54 AM 9/13/2000 -0500, zeb haradon wrote:
>>Could you point out some specific policies which discern Gore and Bush
>>from eachother enough that it will make a lot of difference in the amount
>>of freedom individuals have?
>>Not "positions", I mean specific policies. Gore's "position" on social
>>security is to keep it 100% public, Bush's is to privatize a very small
>>percentage (what % was it again?), which will still be confiscated from
>>you, but which you will be able to decide which government approved stock
>>it goes into. In terms of actual difference that will make in anyone's
>>life, it's not much, unless you consider it a first step towards dismantlement.
A first step is much better than no step, or a step back. At present,
NOTHING is happening that would give us more liberty.
I can only point to Bush's actions in the past re gun control and the
Second Amendment. I don't want to start up the whole guns thread again, so
that's all I will say on the subject. Gore's policies in this respect are
crystal clear, and scare the merde out of me.
I do not appreciate many of Bush's other past policies, such as removing
drug education and rehabilitation in Texas while increasing prisons, but
Gore offers no better solution there.
The best reason I can give for supporting Bush at this point is that if we
get more Libertarians in congress, or a republican majority, at least Bush
is unlikely to veto any good legislation they pass, such as the recent
repeal of the marriage tax penalty.
Chuck Kuecker
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:37:52 MDT