Homeless (was: Re: META: Why I'm boycotting Extropy (TM)

From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Thu Sep 07 2000 - 22:22:08 MDT


At 03:22 PM 7/09/00 -0700, James Rogers wrote:

>> Looking at (for example) the proportion of visible
>> hungry homeless peoplein the USA and Australia

>> I'm sure there's an excuse, though.

>Per the Australian government: ~150k out of 20M people are currently
>classified as homeless
>Per various U.S. sources (primarily advocacy and academic sources): Total
>homeless population in the United States is currently estimated at
>500-750k and relatively stable, depending on the source. Total population
>of the U.S.: around 260M.

Hmm, I'm dead in the water.

I'm sure there's an excuse, though. :)

I mentioned `visible hungry homeless people'. I wonder if the definitions
vary between continents. I don't see that many filthy, demented people
wandering the streets here, panhandling and just looking awful. Admittedly
I don't get out of the suburbs much these days, but Melbourne or Sydney
city proper aren't anything like I recall seeing in Manhattan, say. (The
density of people doesn't feel all that different on the ground, especially
in Sydney.)

Damien Broderick



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:37:31 MDT