Zero Powers wrote:
>
> Bottom line, if Drexler was in it to have a positive impact on the
> development of nano he has done, and is doing, that. On the other hand, if
> he was in it just to be recognized by Joe Q. Public as the ground-breaking
> pioneer in the field, OK, perhaps he lost. But if that was his motivation,
> I’m glad he lost.
Your argument might have merit if they'd managed to also steal Drexler's ideas
about the massive impact of nanotech and the need for safe development.
-- -- -- -- --
Eliezer S. Yudkowsky http://singinst.org/home.html
Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:36:43 MDT