-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, Spike Jones wrote:
> Natasha Vita-More wrote:
>
> > The more due diligence we do, both on the pro-tech groups and the anti-tech
> > groups, the better. Thanks.
>
> It occurred to me there is a minority we havent heard from: the pro-GM
> greens. This is not at all a contradiction in terms, for the line of reasoning
If you know of any, please direct them to my position paper (which, due to
the bizzare Curse of Crit is getting ignored like every single other
Crit-ed document I've ever released... almost like Crit displays a big
"You do not see the Fnords" sign to every web browser but mine...). I'm
especially interested in what pro-GM Greens have to say.
It can be found here (the URL is not a typo):
http://www.memetree.com/crit/nph-med.cgi/http://www.memetree.com/genetech.html
...or just click the third link on the www.memetree.com homepage.
- --
Davidian drug FBI
Why are the above words in my signature? Check out:
http://www.echelon.wiretapped.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.1
iQBoAwUBOXpWJpvUJaRNHMexAQEWKQKYmN5CwhrCTsGXzF7UepH+VMwgGH8//Mkc
/OMjEA4j/hKPSeBJLDo3ajIA2ZN/JCMCOSI69IfjuEwCyrD32vyFSvDRqIUSSaCh
1cUIHUb2Bhijk2I=
=mkt9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:35:07 MDT